Generating evidence for public policy design

Generating evidence for public policy design

What is MIPP?

The Millennium Institute for the Study of Market Imperfections and Public Policy (MIPP) is an interdisciplinary research center bringing together leading academics and professionals committed to developing evidence-based public policies.

Our work focuses on four main areas: business productivity, innovation, labor markets and regional development. Through rigorous research and collaboration with key stakeholders, we seek to contribute to the design and implementation of policies that promote inclusive and sustainable growth.

MIPP en cifras

0 Researchers
0 Publications
0 Books
0 Graduate Students

Research Areas

Political Economy

Institutions, political behavior, and their impact on the design and outcomes of public policies.

Market Design and Regulation

Design of markets and institutions to promote efficiency, competition, and welfare.

Data and Public Policy

Data analysis and empirical evidence to evaluate public policies and understand economic and social phenomena.

Featured Initiatives

Programs and initiatives that drive research and collaboration

Latest Events

Seminars, workshops and activities organized by MIPP

Seminario

Why is the College Premium Falling? The Role of Composition

29 Apr., 2026 Sala de Consejo, piso 4,...

Abstract: Recent studies suggest that the increasing supply of college-educated workers in Latin American countries has negatively impacted returns to skill over the last two decades, as evidenced by the decreasing college premium. In this paper, we show that changes in the college premium do not accurately represent shifts in returns to skill, particularly in the context of a significant expansion in tertiary education. Using novel data with approximately one million college graduates from 20 different cohorts in Brazil, we find that returns to skill have not decreased; in fact, they increased by 24% over 16 years. The supply of college-educated workers has grown, primarily from newer, lower-ranked, and lower-wage-premium universities. Changes in the composition of college workers seem to have driven a decrease in the college premium, even though returns to skill are increasing. Using a simple supply and demand framework (Katz and Murphy, 1992) we show that skill-biased technical change (SBTC) increased by 3% per year over a 12-year period, in contrast to the apparent-0.1% yearly decrease indicated by the unadjusted data.

View detail
Seminario

Is There a «Scarlet E? The Effects of Public Eviction Records on Low-Income Households

22 Apr., 2026 Sala de Consejo, piso 4,...

Abstract: Housing advocates, media outlets, and policymakers have long argued that a public eviction filing record—often referred to as the “Scarlet E”—carries significant consequences, particularly for low-income households. In this paper, we exploit variation induced by a record-sealing policy in Illinois to provide the first causal estimates of the effect of a public eviction filing on residential mobility, neighborhood quality, homelessness, and financial health. Two findings stand out: (i) sealing eviction records at the time of filing prevents tenant screening companies from accessing case information, whereas retroactive record sealing is ineffective in restricting public access; (ii) tenants with public evictions records are more likely to live doubled up with friends or family within the first year of the filing. Our results suggest that housing instability due to public eviction filings manifests primarily through household doubling up rather than through the more extreme forms of homelessness.

View detail
Seminario

Beyond Beliefs: Experimental Evidence on Follow-Through Frictions at School Transitions

14 Apr., 2026 Sala de Consejo, piso 4,...

Abstract: A key puzzle in economics is why households underinvest in education despite high returns. While standard explanations focus on information, this paper highlights the role of follow-through frictions in a school-level RCT in 231 primary schools in Quiché, Guatemala. We document a substantive intention-action gap: 65% of students plan to enroll in secondary school yet 34% of those fail to follow-through on their plans. To causally isolate the effect of follow-through frictions, we randomly assign schools to a pure control, an information treatment, and a mentoring treatment that delivers identical informational content, along with follow-through support comprising classroom based socio-motional skill-building and personalized educational counseling. Information provision has no effect on enrollment. Mentoring increases enrollment by 8.4 percentage points (18%) relative to information, with larger effects among students who already planned to enroll. The evidence points to socio-emotional skills as the operative channel in how mentoring helped improve follow-through.

View detail

Our Team

Excellent researchers from leading Chilean universities

Damian Clarke

Damian Clarke

Universidad de Santiago

View profile
José Correa

José Correa

View profile
Alejandro Corvalán

Alejandro Corvalán

View profile
Juan Escobar

Juan Escobar

View profile